|
|
|
|
You can order any of the articles listed below for €41,65.
Issue 2/2010
Table of Contents
| Andreas Bartosch |
|
| The EdF Ruling – an electrifying Enlightening |
Add to Cart |
| Raymond Luja |
|
Opinion
Substance over Legal Form: Should (non-) incorporated Businesses be Considered Comparable for Fiscal State Aid Purposes?
|
Add to Cart |
| Leigh Hancher |
|
Long-term Contracts and State Aid –
A new Application of the EU State Aid Regime or a Special Case? |
Add to Cart |
| Küllike Jürimäe |
|
| Standing in State Aid Cases: What’s the State of Play? |
Add to Cart |
| Fabio Filpo |
|
The Commission 2009 Procedural Reform from a Private Party Perspective:
Two Steps Forward, One Step Back? |
Add to Cart |
| Henrik Peytz and Thomas Mygind |
|
| Direct Action in State Aid Cases – Tightropes and Legal Protection? |
Add to Cart |
| Irena Dajkovic |
|
| Comments on the New State Aid Law in Serbia in the Context of Serbia’s Accession to the EU |
Add to Cart |
| Martin Farley |
|
The Role of Economics-based Approaches
when Analysing Effects on Trade and
Distortions of Competition after Wam |
Add to Cart |
| Andrés Martin-Ehlers and David Rabenschlag |
|
| Commission v MTU Friedrichshafen: Annotation |
Add to Cart |
| Joachim Englisch |
|
Commission v Koninklijke
FrieslandCampina NV – a clearer Picture
of locus standi and legitimate Expectations |
Add to Cart |
| Fabio Polverino |
|
Have Your Day (or Say) in Court:
The Case of Existing Aid |
Add to Cart |
| Michail G. Papadakis |
|
Aid Scheme Beneficiaries:
Standing to Challenge EC Decision and
Possibility not to pay Recovery Order |
Add to Cart |
| Thomas Lübbig |
|
| They Aren’t Dead Until They’re Gone |
Add to Cart |
| Katarzyna Saryusz-Wolska |
|
Judgments of the General Court concerning
State aid granted to a Polish Steel Producer
– Huta Cze?stochowa |
Add to Cart |
| Wolfgang Weiß and Markus Haberkamm |
|
| Legitimate Expectations in State Aid and the CFI |
Add to Cart |
| Roland Norer |
|
Agricultural Marketing and State Aid Law –
Premature Annulment of the Decision
by the Commission in the Case T-375/04? |
Add to Cart |
|
|